Correction vs. Corrective Action is a common topic in quality management, yet many Conformity Assessment Bodies struggle to differentiate between the two. According to George Anastasopoulos, PJLA’s Technical & International Business Development Manager, understanding this distinction is essential for compliance with the ISO 17000 series.
A Correction is an immediate fix that addresses a detected issue. It solves the problem temporarily but does not prevent it from happening again. For example, if a machine produces defective parts, reworking or scrapping them is a correction. If an employee makes an error in a document, fixing the mistake without identifying why it happened is also a correction.
Corrective Action, however, eliminates the root cause of the problem. It prevents future occurrences and supports long-term quality improvement. For instance, if defective parts result from incorrect calibration, a corrective action would involve updating maintenance procedures. If employees frequently make data entry mistakes, corrective action could include training or process automation.
ISO 17000 standards require corrective actions to resolve nonconformities. Organizations that rely only on corrections risk repeating the same issues, leading to inefficiencies. By prioritizing corrective actions, Conformity Assessment Bodies foster continuous improvement, maintain compliance, and enhance operational reliability.
Incorporating both corrections and corrective actions strengthens quality management systems. While corrections provide quick fixes, corrective actions ensure lasting solutions. Understanding this distinction helps organizations maintain compliance, improve efficiency, and drive long-term success.
Read George Anastasopoulos’ full insights on LinkedIn.
At Perry Johnson Laboratory Accreditation, Inc. (PJLA), we understand that quality is no accident. As George Anastasopoulos, our Technical & International Business Development Manager, recently shared: “Quality is a result of intelligent effort!” This statement perfectly encapsulates our commitment to helping organizations achieve and maintain the highest standards through intentional and systematic processes.
We are excited to announce our upcoming in-person training event: “PJLA Accreditation, Enhancing Laboratories Competitiveness.” This exclusive training will be presented by George Anastasopoulos, PJLA’s Technical and International Business Development Manager.
The medical device industry operates in a highly regulated environment where compliance with safety and performance standards is critical. To streamline the testing and approval process, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) established the Accreditation Scheme for Conformity Assessment (ASCA) Program. This voluntary initiative aims to enhance the efficiency of regulatory submissions for medical devices by leveraging accredited testing laboratories. Perry Johnson Laboratory Accreditation, Inc. (PJLA) is proud to be an FDA-recognized Accreditation Body that plays a vital role in supporting this program.
Operating a successful testing laboratory requires a blend of technical expertise, operational efficiency, and strong business acumen. Many laboratories adhere to ISO/IEC 17025, the globally recognized standard that ensures competence and reliability in testing operations. However, the technical language of ISO/IEC 17025 can be overwhelming for many professionals.
By: George Anastasopoulos, Technical & International Business Development Manager, PJLA
In today’s dynamic marketplace, ensuring consumer confidence and product credibility is more critical than ever. Businesses worldwide are under pressure to demonstrate their commitment to delivering safe, reliable, and high-quality products and services. For those in the certification industry, ISO/IEC 17065 is a vital standard—a globally recognized benchmark for organizations that certify products, processes, and services.
When companies consider pursuing accreditation, cost is often one of the first concerns. While the financial commitment is an important factor, it’s crucial to shift the perspective from “cost” to “value.” At Perry Johnson Laboratory Accreditation, Inc. (PJLA), we’ve seen how accreditation not only elevates performance but also secures its long-term success.
Laboratory assessors play a pivotal role in ensuring organizations meet the highest standards of quality and compliance. At Perry Johnson Laboratory Accreditation, Inc. (PJLA), our assessors are the backbone of our commitment to excellence, guiding laboratories through the accreditation process with precision and expertise. But what exactly makes an assessor? Here, we highlight the top skills and qualities that contribute to effective accreditation assessments.
Perry Johnson Laboratory Accreditation, Inc. (PJLA) is excited to announce its comprehensive schedule of free virtual training workshops for 2025, now open for registration. These workshops are designed to support laboratory professionals, quality assurance personnel, and technical staff in achieving excellence through ISO/IEC 17025 compliance and best practices.